Chapter 3 : FBG simulation and reconstruction
Fig. 3-1 presents a synthetic
view of the subjects treated in this chapter. A FBG can be described in three
domains : space (z), frequency (n) and time (t). The methods used to go
from one representation to the other are also indicated. The T-matrix method
allows to calculate the complex spectral response r(n) when the complex coupling
coefficient distribution q(z) is known [3-1]. The complex coupling
coefficient amplitude is proportional to the refractive index modulation
amplitude Dnac(z), while its phase represents the chirp function
that mixes the average refractive index Dndc(z) and the
period L(z). Inversely, q(z) can be retrieved from r(n) by the
layer-peeling method [3-2]. This method is based on the coupled-mode
formalism [3-3]. The impulse response h(t) can be obtained from the
spectral response by Fourier transform.
Fig. 3-1 Different paths between the FBG representations
This chapter presents the T-matrix and
the layer-peeling methods. The T-matrix is used to calculate the spectral and
impulse response of homogeneous and non-homogenous gratings. From these
responses, the layer-peeling method is studied and the optimal reconstruction
parameters are presented. We also analyze the reconstruction limits observed
for gratings with nearly 100 % reflectivity.
The T-matrix and the layer-peeling
methods are only defined for lossless FBGs and for this reason we have adapted
the two methods to takes account of loss effects.
3.1 |
FBG spectral response simulation in the coupled-mode formalism |
3.2 |
FBG synthesis and reconstruction |
3.3.1 |
Homogeneous FBG examples |
3.3.2 |
Non homogeneous FBG examples |
3.4 |
Reconstruction examples |
3.5 |
Methods for characterizing FBGs with loss or with refractive index and period chirp components |
|
|